Should These Non-Compete Contracts Be Enforced?
Within our last couple posts, we’ve been talking about non-compete contracts and exactly how they’re evaluated by courts within the condition of Kentucky. Given all we have discussed, it’s interesting to check out what sort of massive online retail company handles its very own non-compete contracts with low-wage earning employees.
We’re talking about Amazon . com. The organization lately arrived to focus after an analysis says the organization requires its lowly warehouse workers to sign non-compete contracts. These contracts aren’t anything to sneeze at, either, because they are positively broad in scope. Based on one source, the contracts require employees, for any year . 5 after departing Amazon . com, to vow to not work directly or not directly to aid products or services which contend with individuals provided by Amazon . com. Even periodic temporary personnel are apparently needed to sign these contracts.
The contracts, critics argue, can possible affect an array of business activity and perhaps contain no limitation on geographic scope. Why exactly would Amazon . com put this troublesome legal obligation on temporary workers? Professionals state that one of the reasons is the fact that tasks are still tricky to find and Amazon . com is aware of this can.
The issue of whether Amazon . com would aim to have these contracts strictly enforced on low-wage workers is open, out of the box the problem of whether condition courts would uphold the contracts. As we’ve pointed, different states have different criteria for figuring out whether a non-compete agreement is affordable and for that reason enforceable.
Inside a future publish, we’ll muse a little about how idol judges in Kentucky might view these contracts.